
舞蹈运动疗法对改善轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者负性情绪及生活质量疗效观察
蒋林珍, 余小萍, 徐英, 余艳波, 邱梅
舞蹈运动疗法对改善轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者负性情绪及生活质量疗效观察
Observation of the therapeutic effects of group dance therapy on improving negative emotions and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
目的: 观察舞蹈运动疗法对改善轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者负性情绪,提高其生活质量的临床效果。方法: 将2022年6月至8月我院收治住院的60例轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者随机分为对照组(30例)和研究组(30例),对照组采用常规治疗与康复护理,研究组采用常规治疗与康复护理+舞蹈治疗。舞蹈治疗组每周3次,每次1小时,持续干预12个月。在干预前、干预6个月、12个月分别采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMA)及老年痴呆病理行为量表(BEHAVE-AD)、老年痴呆生活质量量表(QOL-AD)修订版对两组患者进行评估。结果: 干预6个月后研究组患者HAMD、HAMA、BEHAVE-AD评分虽降低,但与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预12个月后研究组患者评分显著降低,且与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预6个月、12个月后研究组患者QOL-AD评分逐渐增加,且与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 舞蹈运动疗法能有效改善轻中度阿尔茨海默病患者的焦虑、抑郁负性情绪,减轻痴呆病理行为,提升患者生活质量。
Objective: The objective of this study is to observe the clinical effects of group dance therapy on enhancing the quality of life and alleviating negative emotions in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Methods: sixty patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, who received inpatient nursing treatment at our hospital from June to August 2022, were randomly divided into a control group (30 cases) and a study group (30 cases). The control group received routine treatment and rehabilitation care, while the study group received routine treatment, rehabilitation care, and dance therapy. Dance therapy was conducted three times a week for one hour each session, with a total intervention duration of 12 months. The patients in both groups were assessed before the intervention, at 6 months, and at 12 months using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMA), Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD), and Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QOL-AD) Revised Version. Results: After 6 months of intervention using this therapy, the HAMD, HAMA, and BEHAVE-AD scores of the patients in the study group decreased, but there was no statistically significant difference compared to the control group (P>0.05). However, after 12 months of intervention using this therapy, the HAMD, HAMA, and BEHAVE-AD scores of the patients in the study group significantly decreased, and there was a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (P<0.05). The QOL-AD scores of the study group patients gradually increased after 6 months and 12 months of intervention, and a statistically significant difference was observed compared to the control group (P < 0. 05). Conclusion: Group dance therapy has been shown to effectively improve negative emotions such as anxiety and depression in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, reduce dementia-related behaviors, and enhance the quality of life for these patients.
舞蹈运动疗法 / 阿尔茨海默病 / 负性情绪 / 生活质量 {{custom_keyword}} /
Group Dance Therapy / Alzheimer's Disease / Negative Emotions / Quality of Life. {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 两组一般资料比较( |
组别 | 例数 | 性别 | 年龄 | AD病程(年) | 受教育年限(年) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 女 | |||||
研究组 | 30 | 12 18 | 75.72±1.52 | 6.85±3.68 | 5.53±3.33 |
对照组 | 30 | 14 16 | 74.83±1.53 | 5.68±2.92 | 5.58±3.38 |
t | —a | -1.323 | 1.129 | -0.053 | |
P | 0.748 | 0.183 | 0.260 | 0.859 |
表2 两组患者MMSE评分比较( |
组别 | 轻度 | 中度 | 总分平均 |
---|---|---|---|
例数 平均 | 例数 平均 | ||
研究组 | 6 21.67±0.75 | 24 15.20±1.63 | 16.50±2.98 |
对照组 | 6 22.16±1.07 | 24 15.04±1.61 | 16.46±3.23 |
t | 1.365 | 1.631 | -0.113 |
P | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 |
Not: MMSE scoring standard: The MMSE score for normal individuals is 27~30 points; Mild dementia MMSE score: 21~26 points; The MMSE score for moderate dementia is 10~20 points. |
表3 两组患者汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分比较( |
组别 | n | 干预前 | 干预6个月 | 干预12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|
研究组 | 30 | 20.73±1.14 | 20.07±1.05① | 18.43±1.28① |
对照组 | 30 | 20.63±1.16 | 20.43±1.28 | 20.3±1.21 |
t | 0.336 | 1.215 | 5.814 | |
P | 0.738 | 0.229 | <0.0001 |
Not: Compared with before intervention, ①: P<0.05 |
表4 两组患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分比较( |
组别 | n | 干预前 | 干预6个月 | 干预12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|
研究组 | 30 | 17.17±0.75 | 16.67±0.8① | 14.87±0.63① |
对照组 | 30 | 17.13±0.78 | 17.07±0.87 | 16.97±1.13 |
t | 0.169 | 1.853 | 8.900 | |
P | 0.866 | 0.069 | <0.0001 |
Not: Compared with before intervention, ①:P<0.05 |
表5 两组患者老年痴呆病理行为量表(BEHAVE-AD)评分比较( |
组别 | n | 干预前 | 干预6个月 | 干预12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|
研究组 | 30 | 15.37±0.61 | 14.33±0.65① | 13.5±0.68① |
对照组 | 30 | 15.27±0.69 | 15.12±0.71 | 15.07±0.98 |
t | 0.592 | 2.083 | 7.185 | |
P | 0.556 | 0.062 | 0.000 |
Not: Compared with before intervention, ①:P<0.05 |
表6 两组患者老年痴呆生活质量量表(QOL-AD)修订版评分比较( |
组别 | n | 干预前 | 干预6个月 | 干预12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|
研究组 | 30 | 36.77±0.73 | 37.8±0.92① | 38.7±1.29① |
对照组 | 30 | 36.83±0.70 | 36.9±0.8 | 37.0±١.٣١ |
t | 0.362 | 4.025 | 5.057 | |
P | 0.719 | 0.0002 | <0.0001 |
Not: Compared with before intervention, ①:P<0.05 |
[1] |
王媛媛, 鲍晓明, 凌云翔, 等. 诱导多功能干细胞治疗阿尔茨海默病的研究进展[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2018, 45(6):637-643.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
张静爽, 王蓉. 阿尔茨海默病发生机制的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2014, 35(6):721-724.
阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer's disease,AD),又称老年性痴呆,是一种神经系统退行性疾病,是痴呆中最常见的类型,在老年人中发病率越来越高,临床上主要表现为渐进性记忆减退、认知功能障碍以及其他神经精神症状和行为障碍。阿尔茨海默病的病因尚未明确,发病机制十分复杂,本文就阿尔茨海默病发生机制的研究进展作一简要综述。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
徐勇, 谭琪, 孙宏鹏, 等. 阿尔茨海默病早期预防策略的中国指南建议[J]. 阿尔茨海默病及相关病杂志, 2018, 1(1):38-41.
目前有关阿尔茨海默病临床治疗效果令人失望,还没有有效的治疗方法,急需要早期预防。阿尔茨海默病早期预防中国策略的证据主要来自国内外文献的循证、干预研究实践、多个案例分析的经验总结,通过结合中国实际,形成了该策略指南。该策略指南坚持“早期、及时、持续和综合”的原则,需要同时针对多个危险因素,进行多靶点预防。由于目前研究的局限,相关证据还不完全,仅供家庭和社会开展阿尔茨海默病预防时参考,我们将根据最新研究成果进一步完善。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
任婕. 基于ICF理论框架系统回顾舞蹈治疗及节律性听觉刺激在脑性瘫痪中的应用[J]. 中国康复医学杂志卷, 2022, 37(7):941-947.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
农青芳, 陈国英, 谢兴, 等. 老年痴呆非药物治疗研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(20):3669-3673.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
李希彤, 谢静涛. 国内音乐疗法对阿尔茨海默病患者干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2019, 39(1):52-56.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
Higher levels of optimism have been linked with positive health behaviors, biological processes, and health conditions that are potentially protective against cognitive impairment in older adults. However, the association between optimism and cognitive impairment has not been directly investigated. We examined whether optimism is associated with incident cognitive impairment in older adults.Data are from the Health and Retirement Study. Optimism was measured by using the Life Orientation Test-R and cognitive impairment with a modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status derived from the Mini-Mental State Examination. Using multiple logistic regression models, we prospectively assessed whether optimism was associated with incident cognitive impairment in 4624 adults 65 years and older during a 4-year period.Among participants, 312 women and 190 men developed cognitive impairment during the 4-year follow-up. Higher optimism was associated with decreased risk of incident cognitive impairment. When adjusted for sociodemographic factors, each standard deviation increase in optimism was associated with reduced odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61-0.81) of becoming cognitively impaired. A dose-response relationship was observed. Compared with those with the lowest levels of optimism, people with moderate levels had somewhat reduced odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.59-1.03), whereas people with the highest levels had the lowest odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.74). These associations remained after adjusting for health behaviors, biological factors, and psychological covariates that could either confound the association of interest or serve on the pathway.Optimism was prospectively associated with a reduced likelihood of becoming cognitively impaired. If these results are replicated, the data suggest that potentially modifiable aspects of positive psychological functioning such as optimism play an important role in maintaining cognitive functioning.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
张楚楚. 我国治疗的发展现状与对策研究[D]. 山东: 山东农业大学, 2020.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
马洋, 孙雪丹, 马晓琳, 等. 群体舞蹈锻炼改善绝经期冠心病妇女各种症状评分情况观察[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2013, 22(3):200-204.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
何芳梅. 音乐干预对焦虑症患者情绪治疗的效果观察[J]. 现代临床护理, 2013, 6: 56 -59.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
张晓忠. 论团队的特征及其作用[J]. 商业经济, 2005(12):115-116.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
孙境含, 王扩. 群体舞蹈治疗运动对老年人体质健康与心理情绪的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 6(40):2583-2586.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
杨茜, 沈冠辰, 毛语桐, 等. 舞蹈治疗老年痴呆症的质性系统评价[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 30(6):67-71.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
张蒙, 谭成华, 白佳瑶, 等. 群体舞蹈治疗锻炼对中老年人积极心理品质的影响[J]. 全科护理, 2019, 8(17):2919-2920.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |